Peter T. Higgins
Deputy Assistant Director, FBI (Retired)
Higgins & Associates International
3116 Woodley Road, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20008
202-625-7780 Voice
202-625-7781 FAX
PeterHAI@aol.com
Journal of Forensic Identification
The Official Publication of the
International Association for Identification
Vol. 45, No. 4, July/August 1995, Pages 409-418
Abstract: As the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) starts
accepting electronically submitted fingerprints for processing and
retention there is a need for a related set of standards. Over the
past four years the FBI has developed the necessary standards for the
exchange of electronic fingerprint data. Local, state and Federal
users of FBI identification services will need to understand and employ
these standards just as they follow the current standards for cards,
ink, etc.
Background
Since the 1920s when the FBI started processing fingerprint cards and
established a national repository, it has promulgated a series of
standards. These standards ensure the completeness, quality, and
permanency of these vital records. They range from the format of the
criminal (FD-249) and applicant (FD-258) cards to the specific ink,
non-ink (chemical), and glue on re-tabs that can be used on the
fingerprint cards. With the introduction of live-scan fingerprint
devices in the 1980s the FBI developed yet another standard, the
Minimum Image Quality Requirements (MIQR) for Live-Scan, Electronically
Produced, Fingerprint Cards.
Currently, the FBI receives over 1,000 live-scan generated fingerprint
cards each work day. The level of live-scan technology that meets the
MIQR resulted in an FBI policy that set forth a cautionary notice [1]
regarding fingerprint image quality and training. Live-scanned
fingerprints lose some of the quality (i.e., information content)
necessary for some latent applications in the process of printing by a
laser printer. Subsequent to the issuance of the cautionary notice FBI
experts further determined that this warning notice is applicable
whether the data is printed or displayed on a CRT. This loss of
information is reduced when the live-scanned fingerprints are submitted
directly via electronic means into Automated Fingerprint Identification
Systems and digital repositories.
By 1997 the number of live-scan fingerprint cards submitted to the FBI
is projected to grow to over 20,000 per work day. For this reason and
to reduce the time for processing fingerprint cards the FBI is moving
toward accepting electronic submittal of virtual fingerprint cards. A
virtual fingerprint card is defined as a series of computer-generated
data records containing the digital representation of the information
found on an inked fingerprint card. A virtual fingerprint card
contains both text and fingerprint image data.
It is important to understand that live-scan devices are digital, that
is they represent the information in fingerprints as discrete values
rather than as continuous shades of grey produced by ink and paper.
Think of a digital clock. It is accurate and precise but typically
does not show seconds, just hours and minutes. While the average analog
clock, with hands and a round dial, shows hours, minutes, and seconds
as well as the movement of the second hand. One way scientists deal
with this lack of information detail in digital clocks is to specify
digital clocks that measure and display more precise information. Some
of these clocks display time to the thousandth of a second. Similarly,
the FBI has developed expanded standards to specify the precision of
the digital fingerprints it will accept.
The FBI's plan to allow virtual fingerprint cards to be submitted
electronically includes comprehensive guidelines on the required
message formats and image quality standards. As a result of the
process of developing these new standards, which took four years to
complete, the FBI has significantly raised the level of digital imaging
quality from that specified in the MIQR. This important improvement
goes a long way toward allowing live- and card-scanned prints to meet
the needs of the entire forensic community. The standards have now
been established and are available today for use by law enforcement
agencies and departments in fingerprint related procurements and
in-house software development. This article will describe the new
standards and tell you how to use them.
IAFIS
A new fingerprint processing environment will be established at the FBI
to deal with virtual fingerprint card processing and retention. This
is being done through the development of the Integrated Automated
Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS). IAFIS will provide the
FBI's ten print service providers and latent print examiners with new
tools and techniques. It will come on-line in 1997 and will be fully
operational in 1998. IAFIS will be a paperless work environment that
will allow the FBI to provide one day service on fingerprint
submittals. For critical submissions, responses will be returned
within two hours on the average. This time does not include local and
state processing time.
To better serve the criminal justice community prior to IAFIS's Initial
Operating Capability (IOC), the FBI is implementing a pilot project to
demonstrate direct, electronic submittal of virtual fingerprint cards
from local, state, and Federal test sites. This pilot, which will be
operational as early as the summer of 1995, is called the Electronic
Fingerprint Image Printing System (EFIPS). Initially, a few test sites
will electronically submit virtual fingerprint cards to the FBI. In
turn, the FBI will use this information for the laser printing of
fingerprint cards at the FBI. Eventually this service will be
available to all submitters as a step on the road to IAFIS. This
initial phase will eliminate the time currently required for mail
delivery and processing. It will also enhance the quality of the
printed cards through the use of tight quality controls on the laser
printers at the FBI.
In phase II of the EFIPS pilot the text portion of the virtual
fingerprint cards will be sent directly into the FBI's computer thus
eliminating the rekeying of this data by FBI personnel. Fingerprint
cards will still be printed at the FBI for use by CJIS service
providers and latent print examiners prior to IAFIS IOC. In fact, the
FBI will retain both its current fingerprint card holdings and all
cards submitted until well after IAFIS becomes operational. This will
allow the FBI to consider the quality of the virtual cards in IAFIS
prior to deciding on a plan for the eventual disposition of the paper
cards.
Standards
With the exception of the MIQR being phased out, no existing
fingerprint card standards will be impacted by the FBI's transition to
IAFIS. This will allow those who do not have access to automated
systems to continue submitting inked fingerprint cards. However,
independent of IAFIS, the FBI is changing the format of the criminal
fingerprint card in 1995 to meet evolving law enforcement needs.
Starting with the IOC of IAFIS the FBI will accept both virtual
fingerprint cards and mailed-in paper fingerprint cards. Any cards
arriving Via the mail will be scanned by the FBI upon receipt and then
processed electronically. Optionally, a local or state Identification
Bureau can scan these cards on an approved card-scan device and then
submit them to the FBI electronically in accordance with the message
standards outlined below.
ANSI Standard - Record Formats
The new standards for virtual fingerprint cards relate directly to many
of the existing standards. The current criminal and applicant card
standards have corollaries in the electronic world. The American
National Standard for Information Systems - Data Format for the
Interchange of Fingerprint Information (ANSI Standard ANSI/NIST-CSL
1-1993) describes the record types associated with digital fingerprint
transmission between any two fingerprint systems. This standard can be
used to standardize the transmission of fingerprints by localities to a
state Identification Bureau or from one Identification Bureau to
another as well as exchanges with the FBI.
The FBI's Electronic Fingerprint Transmission Specification (EFTS) uses
these ANSI record types to define the specific messages that correspond
to criminal and civil fingerprint submittals to the FBI. The EFTS
specifies the content and format of specific fields (e.g., ORI) in each
message and their related responses from the FBI. By way of example, a
criminal ten print submission consists of 16 records - one type I
header record, one type 2 descriptor record and fourteen type 4
fingerprint image records.
Within the ANSI Standard there are nine record types specified (see
table below.) Five of those record types (types 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) are
for the transmission of fingerprint images. It is very important to
note that of these five types only type 4 records, high-resolution
grayscale images (for ten print transactions), and type 7 records, user
defined image data (for latent transactions, palm prints, etc.), will
be accepted by the FBI. The other three fingerprint image record types
(types 3, 5, and 6) are specified for other Fingerprint image
transmissions (e.g., interstate exchange of binary fingerprint images)
and are not to be used to transmit fingerprints to the FBI.
By the time a virtual fingerprint card is transmitted to the FBI, the
message must fully meet both the ANSI and the EFTS standards. Local
departments may choose to use other message formats for internal
purposes or when communicating to the state Identification Bureau, as
long as the final message sent to the FBI is in the ANSI/EFTS format.
If a virtual card arrives in some other format the FBI's computers will
not recognize the format and will reject the transaction.
ANSI Standard Record Types
| Record Type | Logical Record Contents | Accepted by the FBI? |
| 1 | Transaction Information | Yes |
| 2 | Descriptive Data | Yes |
| 3 | Low-resolution Grayscale Fingerprint Image Data (FID) | No |
| 4 | Low-resolution Grayscale FID | Yes |
| 5 | Low resolution Binary FID | No |
| 6 | High-resolution Binary FID | No |
| 7 | User-defined Image Data (e.g., Latent Fingerprints & Palm Prints) | Yes* |
| 8 | Signature Image Data | No |
| 9 | Minutiae Data | Yes** |
*The latent fingerprint data formats will be defined by the FBI in 1995.
**The minutiae data, if any, for IAFIS will be defined by the FBI in early 1996.
ANSI Standard - Image Quality
The MIQR is being replaced with specifications that cover both card-
and live-scan devices. The minimum scan rate in picture elements
(pixels) per inch, the pixel depth in bits (i.e., number of bits which
determines the number of gray levels possible per pixel), and the
acceptable transmission rates are specified in Section 5 of the ANSI
Standard. The minimum scan rate for ten-print records for submission
to IAFIS and EFIPS is expressed in pixels per inch (PPI or P/in). Scan
rates are often expressed in dots per inch or DPI, just another term
for pixels per inch. One term, DPI, comes from the printing industry
and the other, PPI, from the computer industry.
The ANSI standard specifies a minimum scanning resolution of 500 pixels
per inch (P/in) 5 p/in for ten print submittals. However, the
transmission rate is specified as a range from 500 p/in +/- 5 p/in to
520 p/in +/-5 p/in. This allows scanners operating at 600 p/in to be
used as long as the transmitted data meets the ANSI Standard. These
scan and transmission rates were arrived at by balancing forensic
needs, the state of technology, and the cost of implementation. In
1995 the FBI will begin work on upward revisions to these scan and
transmission rates for an anticipated 1998 update of the ANSI
Standard. IAFIS is being designed to be able to contain images scanned
at different data rates. Plans call for the scan and transmission
rates for type 7 records (latent prints) to be as high as 1,000 DPI.
EFTS - Image Quality
The other image quality standards are found in the EFTS's Appendix F,
the IAFIS Image Quality Specification (IQS). The IQS specifies the
data acquisition standards, for the fingerprint portion of the virtual
fingerprint card, such as modulation transfer function (MTF) and
signal-to-noise ratio. The MTF measures how much of the fingerprint
data can be acquired, it reflects the quality of the optics, the
scanner detectors, and the analog to digital converters.
The IQS also specifies quality thresholds for display devices (printers
and CRTS) for the fingerprint data. Just as it would be foolish to
purchase the best color video camera and then play the tapes on an old
black & white TV, it would be foolish to scan fingerprint cards with a
high quality, grayscale scanner and then print out a working copy on a
binary (i.e., black and white only, no shades of gray) laser printer or
display it on a low quality CRT.
IQS standards for printers and other display devices are mandatory for
the purposes of FBI procurements. They are provided to the rest of the
criminal justice community as advice. Obviously, departments are free
to print and display fingerprint data as they see fit. However, if
they are going to submit virtual fingerprint cards to the FBI for
processing and retention then they must comply with all of the relevant
image quality standards (e.g., MTF) in the IQS.
Quality Control
Currently the FBI rejects about 2% of the inked criminal cards and
about 10% of the inked civil cards submitted as having fingerprints
that are illegible. This reflects on poor training and on insufficient
quality control at the point where the fingerprints were acquired.
Digital technology will not eliminate either problem. Training and
quality control are possibly even more important in the digital image
world.
While the person taking the fingerprints can see an image on a computer
screen they often do not see the printed card since frequently it is
printed at another location. The quality of these printed cards
reflects both the quality of the digital data acquired and the quality
of the laser printer itself. Unless a laser printer is maintained
properly any fingerprint cards generated on it from card- or live-scan
data could be illegible or in some cases contain artifacts. Submitting
the fingerprints electronically to the FBI can eliminate laser printer
problems at the Federal repository. It can not eliminate the potential
image quality problems caused by poor capture techniques.
Using engineering measurements (e.g., geometric accuracy), the IQS
ensures that compliant equipment will permit sufficient, accurate
digital fingerprint image data to be acquired and preserved as it goes
from the acquisition site (e.g., live-scan booking station) to the
relevant local, state, and Federal fingerprint repositories. However,
the IQS only ensures that the equipment is of sufficient quality when
purchased, just as the FBI standard for fingerprint card stock ensures
it is of sufficient quality when purchased. The IQS assumes that the
person operating the equipment is trained and following instructions
properly, just as the card specification assumes the person using it
knows how to use it properly. Fingerprint image quality is still very
dependent on the operators ability to record a good image, whether with
a live-scan device or ink. No standard will preclude the wrong finger
being scanned or inked. There are certain levels of quality that only
the person taking the fingerprints and quality control can ensure.
It must be noted that the accuracy of the fingerprint characteristics
and of their inter-relationships being properly captured and
reproduced, either on a card or a CRT, is influenced by the stability
and maintenance of the devices used. If the hardware, software, and
any mechanical components are not maintained within the IQS and other
device specific specifications, then significant degradation of the
fingerprints may occur, possibly even the introduction of fingerprint
artifacts.
It is highly recommended that any agency using live- or card-scan
technology implement a thorough quality assurance plan. The FBI has
received live-scan fingerprint cards that contain printer generated
fingerprint artifacts that constitute actual changes to the
fingerprint. In some cases these changes are easily detected while
others are nearly impossible. The FBI strongly recommends that the
integrity of fingerprints be maintained through robust quality control
processes and quality assurance plans at the local, state and Federal
levels.
Compression
A new area to be standardized, compression rate, is specified in the
FBI's Wavelet Scalar Quantization (WSQ) Gray-Scale Fingerprint Image
Compression Specification. Data is compressed to save time and money
in the transmission of digital fingerprint images and in their computer
based storage at the FBI's repository. The WSQ compression algorithm
was selected for its compatibility with fingerprint data. The
compression rate of 15:1 was selected based on a 1994 IAI comparison
test [2] of various WSQ compression rates.
Each compressed image carries a tag with the compression rate for that
image. This will allow the FBI to use a different compression rate in
the future if the WSQ algorithm's data base of wavelets is upgraded.
IAFIS is designed to contain images compressed by WSQ at different
compression rates. In fact, a typical little finger fingerprint block
(more white space that can easily be compressed) is likely to be
compressed at more than 15:1 while a thumb fingerprint block will be
compressed slightly less than 15:1 to maintain uniform image quality.
There are commercial versions of WSQ software available currently and
at least one is in use with a live-scan system. The FBI is developing
a test methodology for certifying WSQ software solutions as being
compliant with the FBI's WSQ Specification. Both vendor and in-house
developed WSQ software products can be submitted for certification. By
April of 1995 the certification process will be in place.
Electronic fingerprints submitted to the FBI either through EFIPS or
IAFIS may not be compressed with any technique other than WSQ. Images
can only be compressed once since small amounts of scanner data
necessary for compression are lost in the process of compression.
Compressed images can be decompressed many times and used over and over
as long as the original compressed copy is preserved.
Procurement
When procuring card- or live-scan equipment or software to transmit
fingerprint cards to the FBI, departments must be aware of the
standards adopted by the FBI. The FBI is prepared to work with any
department in the preparation of Requests for Proposals (RFPs). All
RFPs should include the ANSI standard for scan and transmission rates,
the IQS, and the WSQ Specification as being mandatory. Recall that the
message portions of the EFTS can be generated by software systems other
than the original scanner so they do not need to be mandated in all
procurements.
The FBI has agreed to "grandfather" all installed or on-order live-scan
equipment that meets the MIQR. Live- and card-scan equipment ordered
after August 31, 1995 must meet the Interim Image Quality
Specifications, a sub-set of the EFTS Appendix F, while all equipment
ordered after the IAFIS Final Operating Capability, currently planned
for the summer of 1998, must meet the full IAFIS IQS. Even
grandfathered equipment must produce virtual fingerprint cards that
meet the record formats in the ANSI Standard and the EFTS. This message
formatting can occur in a process that is separate from the live-scan
device. Only WSQ compression may be used. For fingerprint images that
only meet the MIQR the compression rate should be 5:1 rather than the
15:1 for normal ten print submittals.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Dennis G. Kurre, Danny W. Greathouse,
Stephen B. Meagher, Walter F. Johanningsmeier, Thomas J. Roberts, and
Thomas E. Hopper, all of the FBI, for their review of the numerous
drafts of this article. Additionally, the author thanks his wife,
Kathy, for the fine editing work she always provides.
For further information and copies of the standards contact:
Roy Weise, Unit Chief
Systems Transition Unit
Criminal Justice Information Services Division
Federal Bureau of Investigation
CJIS Satellite II
500 West Pike Street
Clarksburg, WV 26306.
(304)367-8100 for voice or FAX.
1. Section 1.1 of the MIQR, Cautionary Note - Image Quality: "To date,
the specific live-scan equipment configurations accepted for FBI use
produce fingerprint cards which are satisfactory for most ID processing
needs. However, it should be noted that live-scan images printed on
fingerprint cards do not consistently provide all of the ridge
information, such as texture, continuity, edges, and pores, needed to
conduct some latent fingerprint comparisons. Improvements to the image
quality are required for live-scan fingerprint images to provide the
ridge information necessary to support all latent fingerprint
comparisons.
"In addition, extensive testing has revealed that operators of all
currently accepted live-scan equipment models will certainly require
substantially more training to take live-scan fingerprints than to take
inked-fingerprints because of the distinctive methods used to record
live-scan fingerprints. Otherwise, images produced by live-scan
equipment will not provide the exacting fingerprint qualities needed."
2. Polski, J., "President's Message", Journal of Forensic
Identification, 44(3), 1994, pp 297-298.
|